Managing Human Resources Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Managing Human Resources - Essay ExampleThe purpose of any group bunk is to run toward a valued and common goal of an organization. The most cardinal aspect of effective work teams is communication between members of a team in an efficient manner. It involves the ability of each member to meet what the other member is thinking and to determine his/her intentions in an effective manner.There are numerous team development theories and this concept is not new in the modern world. These theories create an effective framework by which the contribution of each member of a team to the teams performance and development dejection be evaluated and analyzed. Belbins surmisal in this regard drop be considered as an important theory in the development of work teams (Napier and Gershenfeld, 1999, p. 79). Belbin suggests that there is domain of nine team attitudes that are considered as important to success. The nine team attitudes are divided into three major categories by Belbin such as musical theme oriented roles, people oriented roles, and action oriented roles. Action oriented roles comprise shaper, implementer, and finisher. The shaper refers to an various(prenominal) who is considered to be a highly motivated leader and possesses sound capabilities in handling pressure (Parker, 1994, pp. 33-37). He is considered to have high competence with regard to handling obstacles and challenges. His dynamism plays a huge role in encouraging others to accomplish their tasks. The Shaper is considered to display a high level of aggression which may at times hurt the feelings of others. It is necessary that work teams have a shaper for achieving the desired results but the existence of more than one shaper may be detrimental to the interest of the team as it can lead to face offs between the two shapers. Implementer refers to those individuals who are reliable, disciplined, and works very hard to fulfil the obligations of the team (Robbins and Finley, 2000, p. 65). They a re