Thursday, April 25, 2019
A constructive trust is the formula through which the conscience of Essay
A constructive trust is the formula through which the moral sense of equity finds its expression. per Cardozo J, Beatty v Guggenheim Exploration Co. (1919) 225 - Essay ExampleThe simple definition found in a freshmans law book is a person, whom we shall call the donor, who has complete confidence in other person, (a friend, a relative, or a lawyer), who shall be called the trustee, and gives this person the right to administer his affairs (be it a house, bonds, jewels, an estate, and so on). This is what one usually understands by the word trust. Judge Cardozo gave the following definition when a property has been acquired in such circumstances that the holder of the legal title may not in good conscience retain the beneficial interest, equity converts him into a trustee.1 This is far from being that categorical, especially when a spile of other factors make it quite confusing, especially when there are differences between the US and the face indication of the constructive trust law.Lord Wright MR2 deplored the absence of an English work on restitution and noted that the American principles of constructive trust stated appear to be consistent with the large and unanalyzed mass of English cases. furthermore, in the Restatement (1937) Lord Wright treats the constructive trust as a remedy, (Lacy p.1) and assesses the one difference between both countries as to the interpretation and that is one of analysis. If the British judges group the equitable jurisdiction as a restitutionary one, thusly the remedies must therefore be given by the common law courts. On the other hand, if the English judges take Cardozos statement as written then the British judicial ashes recognizes this US law a universal one regardless of its context. (Lacy p.1)The following cases, Barnes v Addys 1874 LR 9 Ch App 244, gallant Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan 1995 2 AC 378, Belmont Finance Corp v Williams Furniture Ltds 1968 1 WLR 15555 at 1582, and R v Ghosh 1982 QB 1053, will be used to illustrate the ambiguity of the constructive
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.