CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AND LAW ( A STRATEGY FOR A WATER COMPANY ) Essay

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AND LAW ( A STRATEGY FOR A weewee COMPANY ) Bonus to the writer - Essay ExampleIn the traditional strategy, the design is conducted by a client that is variant from the contractor in orient of constructing the project according to OGC (nd). Other variants of the management contracting strategy acknowledge design, manage and construct and construction management. The design and build strategy on the generate is where the adviser that designs a construction is also charged with the responsibility of actualizing it in reality. The other main strategy is the management strategy. This strategy involves contracting an organization to be in charge of ensuring that other contractors in a project deliver predefined goal effectively (OGC nd). The management contractor in most cases is separate from the consultant that completes the design of the construction. There are a number of factors that must be considered when selecting a contract strategy. The main factor i nvolved in this respect include timing, variation, price certainty, competition, quality, complexity professional responsibility, risk avoidance, and professional responsibility. ... 1. Bestwater Main Rehabilitation Contract Strategy Bestwaters main rehabilitation project is aimed to replace itty-bitty diameter water mains with MDPE pipes. The project however involves a lot of liaising with several authorities. The contract will involve a little of risk related to by the way completion of the work as there is about five years to complete the tasks involved. The work involves general and specialized activities that may necessitate the contracting of different contractual partners to spread the risks involved as well as to achieve the best achievable quality of service. Alternatives In order to accomplish this task, the company may opt to use the traditional and design and build contract strategies. The advantages associated with traditional contract strategy include the competiti ve tendering, cost certainty at the blood line of the construction action and the existence of clear lines of responsibility as noted by Engineering Construction EDC (1985). The strategy also makes it easygoing to change designs firearm making use of the best possible design and construction skills. This strategy can however make it difficult to complete the project in the shortest possible time since decision making is bound to be slow and convoluted. Furthermore, this strategic option requires good organizational interfaces which may not be very easy to achieve. On the other hand, design and build has high buildability levels making the project have short completion times. The companys responsibility in the process is also reduced which makes the company bear less risks compared to the traditional strategy (Walker and Hampson 2002). The quality provided by this option may however not be as good as that offered by